While Mental health is important to one’s overall health, mental health issues have persisted with no global reduction since 1990. This project focuses on analyzing the global burden of mental disorders, as highlighted by the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019 in order to helping policy makers and the public to respond and raise the profile of mental illnesses. The project explores how mental health problems vary geographically and demographically, identifies relationships between different disorders, and investigates underlying risk factors such as socioeconomic conditions. The primary dataset used is sourced from Kaggle, based on data from The Lancet Psychiatry study on the global burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019
Mental health is a growing concern worldwide — but "mental health issues" is a broad term, covering many different types of disorders. When talking about mental health globally, it's easy to focus only on the total prevalence of mental illness in each region, while ignoring an equally important question: what kinds of mental disorders are people actually experiencing?
Understanding the distribution of mental disorder types over time is crucial. Different disorders require different care systems, resources, and interventions. If depressive disorders dominate, for example, the needed response might be very different than if anxiety or schizophrenia were the major drivers.
This chapter aims to explore:
Which types of mental disorders dominate the global population over time, and how have their proportions changed across different years and regions?
Where is the mental health burden the heaviest?
To understand how mental health challenges are spread across the world, We started by visualizing the overall prevalence of mental disorders geographically. Using a choropleth map, We mapped each country's prevalence rate from 1990 to 2019, with color gradients from green (low prevalence) to red (high prevalence).
This map allows users to directly explore both spatial and temporal patterns — filtering by year to see how the burden of mental disorders evolves across time.
What this visualization reveals is a striking and stable pattern: African and South American regions have consistently experienced higher prevalence rates of mental disorders, while East Asian countries (such as China, Japan, and Singapore) maintain much lower levels over time. Despite changes in healthcare, environment, or social factors, the global distribution remains remarkably steady, highlighting persistent geographical inequalities in mental health challenges.
Knowing how much is only part of the story — what about the "what"?
Total prevalence tells us where the problem is severe — but not what types of mental disorders people are struggling with. To break this down, We turned to a dynamic pie chart visualization that shows the composition of different mental disorder types (Anxiety, Bipolar, Depressive, Eating, Schizophrenia) within the global population for each year.
Rather than focusing on raw numbers, this visualization highlights proportions — helping us see whether the internal structure of mental health challenges is shifting over time. An interactive year slider allows users to either select a specific year or play through all years to observe trends.
The insight is clear: depressive disorders and anxiety disorders dominate the global landscape across all years, consistently taking up the majority share. Meanwhile, disorders like eating disorders and schizophrenia remain relatively rare in the global context. Interestingly, despite the growing attention to mental health in recent years, the internal composition of disorder types has changed very little — reinforcing the idea that depression and anxiety have long been, and continue to be, the most prevalent mental health challenges worldwide.
This section of our project explores the relationship between how frequently mental health disorders occur and the extent of their impact on people’s lives, as measured by Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs).
We aim to ask a key question: Do the most common mental health issues also cause the greatest harm to overall quality of life? Or do a few, less prevalent conditions account for a disproportionate share of suffering?
By comparing the global prevalence of each mental disorder with its corresponding DALY value, a scatterplot helps reveal how some disorders may be widespread but relatively less debilitating, while others—though less common—may have a disproportionate impact. The steepness of the trend line or the clustering of points indicates how DALYs change with prevalence:
Depression and Anxiety disorders show a strong linear correlation, indicating that their widespread prevalence proportionally contributes to a significant global disease burden. Depressive disorders, with higher prevalence rates, show an even steeper increase in DALYs, which highlights their severe impact on quality of life. Bipolar disorders, despite lower prevalence compared to anxiety and depression, still result in substantial DALYs due to their chronic and disabling nature. Schizophrenia disorders, though rare, display a disproportionate impact on DALYs, which shows how it may have a high disease burden for affected individuals.
To capture how the burden of different mental disorders has evolved over time, a line chart was used to visualize DALY trends from 1990 to 2019. All conditions besides depression have been steady without decreasing despite growing awareness, while depression has shown a slight fluctuation decrease since 2010. Anxiety and Depressive disorders, with high DALYs rates, suggests that these conditions remain pressing global health challenges despite increased awareness and interventions.
Lastly, a bar graph and geographical heat map of DALYs across countries was used to visualize the global distribution of mental health burdens. Interestingly, high-income countries tend to report higher DALYs, which possibly reflects both better diagnostic/reporting systems and societal pressures. Meanwhile, low- and middle-income countries, particularly in parts of Africa and Southeast Asia, despite Uganda, may show artificially low burdens due to underreporting and limited data. Some regions like Northern Europe and Australia also exhibit high burden levels despite strong healthcare systems, which indicates the complex, multifactorial nature of mental health challenges.
Despite increasing global attention to mental health issues, many countries still face serious inadequate resources for treatment. At the same time, data coverage and investment in research for certain mental disorders are woefully inadequate, which limits the development of effective interventions.
This part of the project analyses treatment coverage, trends and disparities in mental illness globally, with the aim of revealing which countries are weaker in the treatment of mental illness and need to focus interventions and develop responses accordingly.
By using the stacked area chart of Changes in treatment gaps by year, the visualization presents the trend of global mental illness treatment. Analyzing the data from 2002 to 2017, we found that the treatment gap, while briefly improving, remains stark overall, with the chart showing that in most years, the largest proportion of the population was consistently "untreated," most notably in 2002, 2006, 2012, and 2017.
It is worth noting that there were temporary reductions in the treatment gap in 2007 and 2015, which may reflect the success of specific intervention policies or programs, but the overall trend still shows instability and imbalance in the mental health services system. In addition, the ratio of "potentially appropriate treatment" to "other treatment" is consistently low, reflecting the constraints of multiple factors such as access to services, resource allocation, and standards of care.
To understand the treatment gaps between different countries, we used the stacked bar chart to show the treatment of mental illness in different countries between 2002 and 2017, clearly revealing significant differences in global treatment coverage. Some high-income countries, such as Murcia, Spain, the United States, Israel, and high-income countries as a whole, have relatively low rates of untreated people, indicating higher access to mental health services in these countries. In low - and middle-income countries such as Lebanon, Iraq, Nigeria, Mexico and Colombia, the proportion of people "not receiving treatment" exceeds 90%, reflecting poor treatment resources and access to services. Overall, the visualization highlights regional inequalities in mental health services around the world, providing an important basis for identifying priority areas for intervention and developing policy.
To explore trends in global prevalence of mental disorders between 1988 and 2020, we created a series of line charts covering four major mental disorders: anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, eating disorders, and schizophrenia. However, the overall trend in disease burden remains almost unchanged, underscoring that mental illness continues to be a persistent global issue requiring urgent attention and sustained action.
We also observed that North America (represented by the red line) consistently appears at the top across all graphs. This indicates that this region has borne the highest burden of mental illness over an extended period. As a result, our subsequent analysis will focus more closely on the state of mental health within North American countries.
Around the world, mental health issues are becoming increasingly visible, yet many countries still lack comprehensive data and attention to the topic. In contrast, the United States—arguably the most data-rich nation—offers a rare glimpse into the tip of the iceberg of emotional well-being. From the widespread prevalence of anxiety and depression to the ways healthcare systems and social structures shape mental health, the U.S. presents a relatively complete research sample. Could this serve as a reference point for other nations? Perhaps the answer lies in a deeper understanding of the mental health status of the U.S. population.
The data reveals that among the U.S. population, depressive symptoms are most commonly expressed as low energy and sleep problems. Nearly 10% of people report feeling low energy almost every day, while more than 1/3 experience it every few days. Similarly, sleep disturbances are a widespread concern, with over 20% of respondents struggling with sleep on a regular basis. These findings highlight not only the prevalence of emotional distress but also the often-overlooked burden carried by individuals who may not meet the clinical threshold for depression yet still face significant mental strain. Addressing this subtle but pervasive challenge is crucial for effective public health interventions.
Over the past three decades, anxiety and depressive disorders have become the most prevalent mental health conditions in the U.S. Anxiety disorders, affecting the largest share of the population, saw a sharp rise in the late 1990s, peaking around 2000 at nearly 6.7%. Although the rate declined in the years following, it began climbing again as 2020 approached. Depressive disorders, the second most common, steadily increased from under 4% in 1990 to about 4.5% by the early 2000s and have remained relatively stable since then. Together, these two disorders impact millions of Americans annually, presenting a significant public health concern.
Schizophrenia, while affecting a smaller portion of the population compared to anxiety and depression, also follows an important trend. From 1990 to around 2005, the share of the U.S. population with schizophrenia rose slightly from 0.43% to a peak of about 0.46%, followed by a gradual decline in subsequent years. Despite its lower prevalence, the U.S. reports the highest rate of schizophrenia among all countries, highlighting the need for continued research, awareness, and support for those affected by this condition.
Through the above four chapters, we can comprehensively analyze global mental health issues. From prevalence rates to treatment gaps, and even the emotional well-being of specific regions such as the United States, each topic reveals distinct challenges and opportunities. Overall, the global mental health crisis is not only about "how many people are affected," but more critically about how to assess the impact of mental disorders, improve access to care, and develop data-driven, targeted intervention strategies. Advancing unified global data standards and increasing research investment are key steps toward achieving mental health equity.
1. https://www.kaggle.com/code/imtkaggleteam/mental-health-eda-prediction
2. 2022. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Psychiatry 9, 137–150.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00395-3
3. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(21)00395-3/fulltext